display: Codex was developing this: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/111   It has finished the initial development, created a PR and Claude has given it a revew. We need to address relevant issues from the comment posted in the PR


display: Analyze current work tree. Do you understand the changes?


display: You can use gh api to get issue contents


display: Let's do actual run? No point in doing dry runs at this moment - we need to know whether the actual regression will succeed


display: It's something you've done incorrectly. GMD is able to run with hardware acceleration on this env


display: Walkthrough mentioned that regression was run on aosp image, that means no billing. We should verify that too


display: Nope, skipped usually means some kind of errors. Check closer


display: There should be document, describing how to run it locally. Most of the stuff was already done, signinging in, etc. We just need to run it correctly


display: sandbox account is yorvana.app@gmail.com. Set this to the .bashrc file, please


display: There should be a GMD device with google services. We have run it with codex just yesterday on this env


display: I thought that I need to login only once on the emulator


display: Since you're in headless, you should've passed 0.0.0.0 to serve to the LAN


display: Done. Signed in. Can we make this snapshot somehow, so that deleting it requires extra steps? So that cleanManagedDevices won't just blindly kill this


display: if userdata saves restart, why then I had to relogin from yesterday?


display: Now I want to verify that THE WHOLE regression suite runs. Including billing


display: You sure that emulator console is a relevant error even?


display: And CI pipeline is setup correctly to run those regressions, correct?


display: Regarding billing - CI will run both scenarios?


display: Use hardware rendering. I've asked you to do so many times


display: waiting for device in logcat. Is that expected?


display: agregator script tests. Are they included somewhere or you need to run them separately? Itnwill be logical for them to be automatixally ibcluded in gradle somehow, if thats possible. Same for the funxtion itaelf


display: Theres a review comment from Claude and a comment from Semgrep


display: Claude wrote a comment on behalf of Mesya82


display: The CI run failed: https://github.com/yorvana/android/actions/runs/26532164843   Use gh api to get data


display: The aggregate job seems to be always pushing to master. Is that right?


display: The run is green but the dashboard file says that there was an infra failure


display: I also want to make sure that failures like this will make the run red, so that its obvious without reading the dashboard (which I might forget), that something is wrong. This is not the case where we should be having green step


display: dashboard file says that "R-R01" needs attantion, after regression run


display: There are merge conflicts that needs to be resolved


display: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/132   There's a plan in the comments. We need to tackle Phase 1


display: To add to that - can we also make regression pipeline receive a flag to run full test when triggerring manually?


display: I've triggered a full regression run it seems like all tests passed but the step is red


display: Wait, so full check will run 2 suites with the second one being partially overlapped with the first one?


display:
On CI. It's not completed yet, but we can tackle the failed step, I think. > Task :regressionFullExtendedCheck:app:pixel2api33DebugAndroidTest
pixel2api33 Tests 0/15 completed. (0 skipped) (0 failed)
com.yorvana.regression.attachments.AttachmentRealOsRegressionTest > rA04_nonImageAttachment_launchesSystemViewerIntent[pixel2api33] SKIPPED
pixel2api33 Tests 3/15 completed. (1 skipped) (0 failed)
com.yorvana.regression.attachments.AttachmentRealOsRegressionTest > rA06_attachmentStillResolvableAfterVaultMoveMidSession[pixel2api33] FAILED
    androidx.compose.ui.test.ComposeTimeoutException: Condition still not satisfied after 60000 ms
    at androidx.compose.ui.test.AndroidComposeUiTestEnvironment$AndroidComposeUiTestImpl.waitUntil(ComposeUiTest.android.kt:887)
pixel2api33 Tests 4/15 completed. (1 skipped) (1 failed)


display: There are also other failures already surfaced


display: The same run, you can access it yourself through gh api


display: Is this expected that extended regression takes much longer?


display: Also question regarding nightly job. Is it nightly as unconditionally running every day or there are additional conditions?


display: Can we add a condition that does this only if there were commits done since last run?


display: Did CI run - green. But previous one contaminated run history. We need to clean that up. Dont forget to pull the changes


display: Ive tried to run deploy to google play job and it failed: https://github.com/yorvana/android/actions/runs/26593804301/job/78359289011    Use gh api to get logs


display: Does this pipelone use cache, as the others?


display: It went past previous step but still failed: https://github.com/yorvana/android/actions/runs/26617305142/job/78435619658


display: give me the lonk to creatr a new json key


display: When creating service account, what role should be set?


display: The regression test suite has been implemented. The


display: current doc file is formed more like a plan to


display: impmement, but we need to make it as a permanent doc


display: file about implemented feature. And before that we


display: need to go through the doc file and the code to see


display: whether there are discrepancies (do not fix anything,


display: The regression test suite has been implemented. The current doc file is formed more like a plan to impmement, but we need to make it as a permanent doc file about implemented feature. And before that we need to go through the doc file and the code to see whether there are discrepancies (do not fix anything, juat list everything out)


display: All of the changes only in the doc file itself?


display: Migration test is not implemenyed because there is no migration logic implemented yet, because theres no migration needed to be done - the apl has not hit the prod yet


display: I think we can keep it as a placeholder (with a note) for when we will impkement the migration


display: 1 - arent there any comments in the code that might shed a light on why it wasnt done like this?


display: The likely reason is that SAF approach may be somewhat fragile


display: Use gh api. The second to last regressiion run in CI failed. 2 things: determine why it failed and second, determine while aggregate job was skipped - the idea is that when tests fail, the run should be red but the aggregatipn should still be run


display: So, since there were no fizes for the test itswld (or the prod code), it shoild fail again


display: Now billing test. Last run ran for 24h and was automatically cancelled


display: Self hosted runner is incprrect. We meed to asses whetjer it can run in ci


display: Okay, then lets disable the daily run for now. Dont remove it though


display: The branch has been merged. You can push it direcrly to master


display: Theres a dependabot PR. There should be a doc explaining the resolve process of those


display: Can you extract all icon ao I can upkoad it as icon to Google Play listing?


display: Actuslly, on the same level as this project, theres site prpjext which should have an icon. Can wr use it?


display: Based on a project, can you generate me app icon ideas?


display: Where can i find those in a file system?


display: Np, everything looks either like chineese low effort app or like 2010s photoshop icon. We need to give more emphasis on the fact this is the app for car enthusiasts


display: Those do not go well with the design philosophy of the app


display: y monogram. Thats not bad. But roads is just car related, but not it. Maybe Y stylized as a wrench? Maybe some additional detail, if needed


display: 3 ia good. Now we need version that will play well with dynamic icon colors


display: I've came up with a new icon for the app. It's currently in Figma. What do you need to adapt it to a proper app icon that supports dynamic coloring?


display: The background is flat. The icon consist of 2 vector elements. One is white and second is white with 75% opacity. What is the easiest way for me to approach this?


display: Something broke. Now the icon is standard android icon


display: Still nope. Previous icon was adaptive and did work. Also, the first one I've sent you also did work. I just scaled down the graphic because it was too close to the edges of circle icon


display: Nice. Now we need to update google play build version so we can create a new release with the new icon