Do you have an access to the list of open PRs?


So those are dependabot PRs. What I want you to do is to go through each of them. The plan is to: checkout a PR, validate it (build, jvm test suite, smoke test suite (gpu acceleration)). Then if everything is green - merge it. If not - do a fix, commit and push and then wait for my review. Then after going through review procedure, mergin it, tackle next one


Implement the plan.


Screenshot test failed most likely because the app was renamed prior to release, so that one place, where the name is shown on screen is now changed. We, most likely, just need to record new screenshots


There's a review comment posted. Review issues there and resolve if applicable


The PR has been approved. You can merge and proceed to the next one


The PR has been approved. You can merge and proceed to the next one. Also be sure that the next one has latest master (with prior PRs resolved) merged in


Continue


I want to add a Contact item in the Settings menu


Create a PR from latest master


Claude said that there's 2 unresolved items left still


Its still the same comment that you were looking before. You havent addressed all the items. If you havent, because there were reasons for that - you must've left a comment


It's not the only comment, what the hell are you talking about? https://github.com/yorvana/android/pull/102#issuecomment-4479766517


There's a another review comment posted. Review issues there and resolve if applicable


Pushed?


Comment left?


Did you do smoke test run?


You can merge it


We need to start the implementation of this issue: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/103


Generate a file named AGENTS.md that serves as a contributor guide for this repository.
Your goal is to produce a clear, concise, and well-structured document with descriptive headings and actionable explanations for each section.
Follow the outline below, but adapt as needed — add sections if relevant, and omit those that do not apply to this project.

Document Requirements

- Title the document "Repository Guidelines".
- Use Markdown headings (#, ##, etc.) for structure.
- Keep the document concise. 200-400 words is optimal.
- Keep explanations short, direct, and specific to this repository.
- Provide examples where helpful (commands, directory paths, naming patterns).
- Maintain a professional, instructional tone.

Recommended Sections

Project Structure & Module Organization

- Outline the project structure, including where the source code, tests, and assets are located.

Build, Test, and Development Commands

- List key commands for building, testing, and running locally (e.g., npm test, make build).
- Briefly explain what each command does.

Coding Style & Naming Conventions

- Specify indentation rules, language-specific style preferences, and naming patterns.
- Include any formatting or linting tools used.

Testing Guidelines

- Identify testing frameworks and coverage requirements.
- State test naming conventions and how to run tests.

Commit & Pull Request Guidelines

- Summarize commit message conventions found in the project’s Git history.
- Outline pull request requirements (descriptions, linked issues, screenshots, etc.).

(Optional) Add other sections if relevant, such as Security & Configuration Tips, Architecture Overview, or Agent-Specific Instructions.


Push this


Implement the plan.


Create a PR


There's a review comment


You can merge this


We need to start the implementation of this issue: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/105


Can't we use material web components?


Okay, proceed


execute


You can install those, so we can verify locally


Can you run the server and make it available in LAN? I want to test it from my side. Also, you're in distrobox, so if there's additional config needed - tell me


The site looks great, but it's not Material 3


Better. Still not it. Use https://m3.material.io/ as an inspiration


This is good for now. The first card header is far too large. It doesnt fit fully even on laptop screen. And I havent even opened it on a phone


Still too big. I would say that nothing changed whatsoever


In feature cards 2 last ones are not needed. End user doesnt care about that. Especially the ones I'm targeting


Now, I guess, I need to provide screenshots and create a Google Form?


Can you list the screenshots I need to provide?


Same list but with expected file names


Why you need settings page, though?


I did add the screenshots


Now the Google Form. How do I do it?


Make the form container little bit taller - doesnt fit without scrollbar


That was too much


Now there are a bunch of issues on mobile: first card no padding - text goes to the edge and buttond aswell; feature cards - first one is like half a finger width; screenshots card text also has no padding;  beta signup padding issue aswell


Now the logo. We should be using the one used for the app. Do you need the svg?


The android repo hsa it


The logo contents is too small. Like the logo itself is a good size, but the contents is very small in there


Better. Now make the whole thing little bit largger


Make the logo contents larger again


2 things: first card contains JSON in the text. The user don't need, this is too technical. And first card contains a screenshot-type thingy. I don't really like that it doesn't really represent what the app looks like


At the top tere's some kind of bar on that hero screen. What is it? Why do we need it? And the screen doesn't go to the edges of the "hero phone"


I think top card header is still too big


"Real app screens will land here." That sounds strange for a production site


There's an unncesessary work break in that new line


Create a PR with those changes


How can you don't have an access to create a PR. I'm the owner of the repo


How can I create a token that will work with whole yorvana org repos?


Try again


For some reason, fine grained permissions got reset. What do I need to select?


HTTP 403: Resource not accessible by personal access token (https://api.github.com/user/keys?per_page=100)


gh auth status shows everything is good


I think I know why. One sec


Try now


The issue was that I previously disabled Pull requests as a feature in this repo


There's a review comment posted. Address issues raised there


Implement the plan.


Ive viewed the site with dark mode on the phone and it looks good. But one thing stood out and, I think, worth fixing: the screenshots in dark mode should be also from dark mode of the app. That will be nice touch


I will provide the dakr mode screenshots


Added the screenshots


You can merge


I've scanned the live page through the Google SSO analyer and it threw a warning: "Missing field 'aggregateRating'". Is it worth adding?


We need to implement this: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/111


If you have something to challenge with the plan - hit it


Post this as a comment


Do it


Claude responded to your comment


Create a PR from latest master


Please review changes in PR 113


Post this


The issues has been addressed, PTAL


Do a full sweep


post


Post


do a full sweep


зщые


github pr 112


/resume


Review current open github pr


Both


nothing else to add?


Specificity was added by Claudes review request


Medium - specifically asked not to add it, because agent can figure it out. If nothing else - push


We need to implement this story: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/114


Claude wrote an implementation plan: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/114   Evaluate it. Do you agree with everything? Anything to improve?


Post this as a comment


Claude did adjustments and left a comment


Now let's do this one: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/115


No, I wanted the review the same way you did with the previous issue


post


Claude addressed the comments and left a comment


Nothing else to add?


Now let's do Phase 3 issue. Same review treatment


Claude addressed the issues and left a comment


Now the same treatment for Phase 4 issue


Sorry, missclick. Posr


next phase issue, same treatment


hich phase is it?


hello


Now I want you do review all 7 phase issues together. Whether now is good\


Add this then to the relevant issues comment


Claude has addressed both of those


Maybe do one more full sweep across all 7 phase issues


Claude addressed all the issues


Do another full sweep


R-P05 - I think the way to make an actual device appear offline is a better approach for this kind of test suite. R-A03 as far as I'm aware, writing test suite should not invlove exposing stuff just for test sake (besides test ids) that otherwise would not have been exposed - bad practice


Leave comment in relevant issues


Which phase issues are those?


Claude addressed the issues


Do a full sweep


Post


post


Claude addressed both issues


do a full sweep


Claude addressed the issue


Claude has addressed all the issues. Do a full sweep


/compacts


Now review PR 122


Claude addressed the comment. Do a full sweep


https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/114    Implement this issue


Implement the plan.


Create a PR from latest maste4


Theres a review comment


merge


Inpkement this story: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/115


32 smoke tests? there was 13


Create a pr from latest master


yoi can merge


Implement this: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/116


Shouldnt test suite pass by the end of the implementation?


Gemini was working on resolving the latest review comments for the current PR and it is stuck with the regression suite not passing and it should be green by the end of the implementation. PTAL


push


Claude left a comment


Implement this story: https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/117


https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/118     Imlement this


Create a PR from latest master


Now "self-hosted play/billing setup". What does this mean and how do we set up this locally?


Wait. What if I don't have a real android device to connect?


Can't we use gmd image with play services?


"you may still need to open the emulator". Verify that. I don't have an ability to open the emulator, so we need to confirm this or not.


Okay, let's explore remove emulator opening. Right now, you're headless. Maybe there are soltuions? Like through a web browser?


Again, the idea is that if I would be able to view and control the emulator with the current headless set up (like served web page), I would be able to login


If additional tools may need to be installed - we can do that


dev/kvm should be available since other GMD emulators work with hardware acceleration


Continue


GPU acceleration must be used. There's zero point in trying software rendering


You've been rate limited. Continue please


It works! Now we need to document this and make this more easily repeatable for the future


It works! Now we need to polish this, document this and make this more easily repeatable for the future


Launch it. So I just need to login to google play, correct?


Wait, if there's already controller launched, we need to either use it or kill it


I've logged in with an account that is added to the internal testers track


And to setup Google Play console stuff I need to do a internal track release, correct?


What should I run to build a release bundle?


Run it for me, please


I want to adjust version. It should include something like 1.0.0-rc.1 or something, signifying that this is a internal track version


Version code 1 has already been used. Try another version code.


Wait. What is versionCode and how it is used?


Okay, proceed


There's this warning This App Bundle contains native code, and you've not uploaded debug symbols. We recommend that you upload a symbol file to make your crashes and ANRs easier to analyse and debug.


Now I'm creating the one time product (is that correct?). Should I add any tags? I've set product ID as "premium_lifetime"


Purcahse Option ID?


done


Can't find license testing option


What should it be? RESPOND_NORMALLY?


done. I guess, now we can try running the tests?


done. I guess, now we can try running the tests? Or I need to open the emulator and press Restore?


"the tester has not opted into the internal test track". Elaborate


Let's try again


give me the full command to run by myself. I will check it periodically


I see it skips the passes, but don't see the logs as to why


Can we make sure that errors like this will be explicitly logged? I don't want to jump to logs files for the logs, that should be outputted at once


Seems like it propagated. Now different error


Try again


Proceed


Now inspect the vhanges for polishing opportunities


I want you to do the same for the whole pr


Claude left a comment


Is everythibg regardijg running billing tests locally documented? like logging in, age consent, etc


then merge


Implement this https://github.com/yorvana/android/issues/119


Implement the plan.


Why software acceleration? It should be hardware


Any GMD run should use hardware rendering. Remember tgat


So the new tests pass?


Create a PR from latest master


You should be able. The issue is not gh


Theres a failed regression run. We need to investigate it. Use GPU acceleration


I understand that this is flaky bug. Maybe do 2-3 runs to be 100% sure?


Can you revert the fix (or stash it) and reproduce the issue?


Swiftshader doesnt work locally. Try angle


I dont like the fact that were apllying the fix blindly, basically


Lets add the logs and monitor it


push


Create a document that describes the issue and logs, so that, when catched, an agent can pick up the conext faster


Push


Adapt this SVG icon to an app icon set: <svg width="108" height="108" viewBox="0 0 108 108" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg">
<path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M0 54V108H54H108V54V0H54H0V54Z" fill="#3270A1"/>
<path fill-rule="evenodd" clip-rule="evenodd" d="M37.6163 32.8015C36.8703 33.0253 34.3487 35.2472 32.8398 37.0102C29.4555 40.9648 27.2203 46.0107 26.5935 51.1113C26.4136 52.5753 26.4124 56.2105 26.5914 57.6472C27.5324 65.1965 31.6191 71.9279 37.982 76.4091C40.8183 78.4066 42.6346 80.7899 43.5639 83.734C44.1558 85.6088 44.1898 85.419 44.1898 90.1346V91.1727C44.1898 92.8295 45.5329 94.1727 47.1898 94.1727H53.9916H60.822C62.4677 94.1727 63.8061 92.8469 63.8219 91.2013L63.8369 89.6275C63.7935 85.6739 63.9032 85.7232 64.0679 85.0502C64.9592 81.4079 66.7588 78.7476 69.7797 76.6063C73.0402 74.2952 75.6856 71.5502 77.5529 68.5405C79.5949 65.2493 80.8664 61.6722 81.405 57.7035C81.589 56.3478 81.5875 52.5875 81.4024 51.1113C80.5339 44.1836 76.7381 37.4572 71.4494 33.4732C70.2037 32.535 69.2953 32.44 68.4728 33.1618C67.6916 33.8474 67.7468 32.719 67.7497 47.9275C67.7519 60.1274 67.7324 61.7361 67.5794 61.9544C67.4844 62.09 66.4061 62.8045 65.1832 63.542C63.9602 64.2797 61.0161 66.0567 58.6406 67.4912C55.6738 69.2827 54.2204 70.0992 53.9985 70.0992C53.7771 70.0992 52.4037 69.331 49.6375 67.6599C47.4166 66.3182 44.5089 64.5637 43.1759 63.7611C41.8429 62.9584 40.6508 62.2037 40.5268 62.0842C40.3044 61.8697 40.3006 61.6815 40.245 47.9248C40.2033 37.6148 40.1545 33.9239 40.0574 33.7573C39.561 32.9045 38.5684 32.5158 37.6163 32.8015Z" fill="white"/>
<path d="M64.3578 46.7269C64.9657 47.087 65.3386 47.7412 65.3386 48.4478V59.4091C65.3386 60.1157 64.9657 60.7699 64.3578 61.13L55.18 66.5655C54.5516 66.9378 53.7702 66.9378 53.1417 66.5655L43.9639 61.13C43.356 60.7699 42.9831 60.1157 42.9831 59.4091V48.4478C42.9831 47.7412 43.356 47.087 43.9639 46.7269L53.1417 41.2913C53.7702 40.9191 54.5516 40.9191 55.18 41.2913L64.3578 46.7269ZM54.1618 47.0461C50.3591 47.0461 47.2761 50.1275 47.2761 53.9289C47.2761 57.7303 50.3591 60.8117 54.1618 60.8117C57.9644 60.8115 61.0466 57.7302 61.0466 53.9289C61.0466 50.1276 57.9644 47.0464 54.1618 47.0461Z" fill="white" fill-opacity="0.75"/>
</svg>


Now increase build version for gplay publish


it should be rc1. Just incremenet versionCode


There are open dependabot PRs. Go through them. There's a doc describing the process


With Claude Fable we were able to set up the app. The core functionality for me works good, now it's time for QoL. The plan is to write up a functional spec first and then implement it after it has been verified and finalized. Now, what I want to is some kind of "cart" - the products I find can be added to some kind of "cart" (grouped by stores) so then I see exactly which orders I need to make and total amount of everything in the "cart". I just don't know that "cart" is the correct name, but we can discuss this


Specific offer was my idea, yes. That's why I mentioned grouping. Choosing same part from another store: pop a confirmation message to remove the previous part - we can leave the both parts, just highlight them so that it's obvious that the parts are the same, just different store offers (can even have a "rainbow" highlight for different parts so that it's easy to distinguish between). Name: Pirkumu plans is good. Persistence: indefinitely in this browser (local storage), but would be nice to have a functionality that will try to refetch specific items from the store, to actualize the prices and availability and show a message if it has been changed since the last time user saw the plan


If backend cannot provide freshness, we must try to implement the checking mechanism


Also, I want to add a feature: highlight the store offer for which we already have offers selected in the plan. So we can see which stores already have the offers we select, so we can bulk order


You had open questions?


1 - they are alternatives for consideration (i.e. maybe one store will have other, cheaper products and the overall order will be larger which is preferrable), but I don't know how to better organize the UX. 2 - show a banner that the offers may be outdated with a button to refresh? What do you think? 3 - selectable out of all options


Sounds good


Now let's plan out the implementation


1. I think overlay is better. Like a slide in side panel. Keep in mind mobile version. Regarding the refresh: ideally we should not do the search again. We should try open an actual product page in the store and there get the new data.


/fast false


Continue


There's no docker, it's podman


IC24 case is exactly what should happen in this scenario. But also, did you try home page warmup?


If you need for me to solve the challenge, I can do it. If you need to that for more detailed reconiscance


done


So now we can kick off the implementation?


So now we can kick off the implementation?/


Looks very good. One nit: the animation for open close is very blocky. Let's do something like Material 3 Expressive


Make it faster.


That looks good. What we need to adjust is the plan store. We store it in localStorage but one of the cases, that I imagine will happen is that I can add to the plan the items on desktop and then continue from phone. So I imagine we must store this on the backend. You can omit user identification since the standard usecase for this app at this point and stage is single user


Piedāvājums mainīts: Uz pasūtījumuPiedāvājums no piegādātāja bez precīzas informācijas par pieejamību. Iespējama atteikšanās vai piegādes termiņa maiņa. Atteikšanās gadījumā maksājums tiks automātiski atgriezts.Nosūtīšanas datums: 24 July → Uz pasūtījumuPiedāvājums no piegādātāja bez precīzas informācijas par pieejamību. Iespējama atteikšanās vai piegādes termiņa maiņa. Atteikšanās gadījumā maksājums tiks automātiski atgriezts.Nosūtīšanas datums: 27 July     This text I get when I update the plan. I don't expect the data to change after a few hours, so it does extract wrong data and then assume that it has been changed


That is applied only to handler.lv or to all stores?


You need to test all the stores for such a case and see how it behaves and fix if needed


Looks good. Now you can commit


Do you see distribution implementation docs? The Phases?


Let's implemented Phase A


There's a code review: /tmp/claude-1000/-home-Messier82-projects-car-parts-comparator-poc/f0672c66-7fab-4cec-af61-9887283b584a/scratchpad/code-review-report.md


Commit


Let's kick off next phase


The review is in: [
  {
    "file": "spikes/electron-browser/main.mjs",
    "line": 62,
    "summary": "On navigation timeout, the still-pending window.loadURL() promise rejects unhandled after webContents.stop(), crashing the process instead of reporting a clean timeout.",
    "failure_scenario": "A slow/hung navigation hits NAVIGATION_TIMEOUT_MS. The timeout branch calls window.webContents.stop() and rejects the race. loadURL() then rejects with ERR_ABORTED, but nothing awaits or .catch()es it (the race already settled). main().catch does not cover this orphaned promise → unhandledRejection terminates Electron non-zero, so the timeout fallback the spike depends on never produces its 'timeout' result."
  },
  {
    "file": "spikes/electron-browser/main.mjs",
    "line": 71,
    "summary": "pageSnapshot is always called with status=null for page navigations, so the reported HTTP status is always null and challengeMarkup's `status === 403` branch is dead for HTML loads.",
    "failure_scenario": "loadURL() never surfaces the HTTP status, and load() hardcodes null. Every HTML/origin probe reports `status: null` (e.g. Autodoc's result row), and a 403 challenge page whose body lacks the text markers ('just a moment', 'challenge-platform', etc.) is classified `challenged: false` → false PASS. Detecting the status needs a did-navigate listener (httpResponseCode), not a null."
  },
  {
    "file": "spikes/electron-browser/main.mjs",
    "line": 234,
    "summary": "A single executeJavaScript/fetch rejection in any probe aborts all four probes and exits 1 with no partial report.",
    "failure_scenario": "browserFetchJson/pageSnapshot rejects on a transient renderer error during the warm run. The exception unwinds past the try/finally (windows destroyed), skips report assembly/writeFile, and exits 1 via main().catch — discarding the already-passed cold results. For a harness the README calls rerunnable/measurable, one flake loses the whole run instead of recording a failed probe and continuing."
  },
  {
    "file": "spikes/electron-browser/main.mjs",
    "line": 141,
    "summary": "trodoProductCount uses Number(final_price ?? price) > 0, which silently yields 0 for localized/string prices and forces a false-negative probe failure.",
    "failure_scenario": "If Trodo's JSON returns a formatted price string (e.g. '12,34' with a comma decimal, or a currency-suffixed string), Number(...) is NaN, every product is filtered out, productCount is 0, and the probe reports ok:false even though the session cleared and products were returned — a spurious NO-GO signal for Phase B."
  }
]


Did you run the electron check again? I guess after the first fix, the result may change


Does this mean that we have an actual electron executable?


The review is in: [
  {
    "file": "web/src/app/app.html",
    "line": 266,
    "summary": "The 'View at store' / plan clickout links changed from <a href> to <button (click)>, dropping middle-click, ctrl/cmd-click, and 'open in new tab' — a measured-clickout regression for the metric the POC exists to prove.",
    "failure_scenario": "A user middle-clicks or right-click→'Open in new tab' on 'View at store' (common for comparison shopping). A <button> fires no navigation for middle-click and has no context-menu open-in-new-tab, so the /out clickout is never recorded. The ≥30% CTR gate is undercounted precisely for power users, and there is no href to copy/share either."
  },
  {
    "file": "src/engine.ts",
    "line": 49,
    "summary": "Engine re-runs adapter lookup, normalizeQuery, and validateOutUrl that server.ts already performed, and its EngineRequestError branches are dead in the POC path — a latent 500 if the server pre-checks are ever removed.",
    "failure_scenario": "server.ts:120-127 and :162-165 already 404/400 on unknown store / bad query / bad URL before calling the engine, so engine.ts:50-54 and :66-70 never throw in the POC. If a future caller (or a trimmed route) relies on the engine's own guards, EngineRequestError propagates uncaught through Fastify as a 500 instead of the intended 400/404, because nothing maps that error to a status."
  },
  {
    "file": "web/src/app/core/search.gateway.ts",
    "line": 96,
    "summary": "The Promise→Observable `fromPromise` helper is copy-pasted verbatim into both search.gateway.ts and purchase-plan.backend.ts.",
    "failure_scenario": "Two identical 10-line implementations drift independently; a fix to one (e.g. unsubscribe semantics) silently misses the other. rxjs already ships `from(promise)` with cancellation-on-unsubscribe — the local helper reimplements it."
  }
]


Can you build a portable .exe for Windows. I will verify myself


What are my steps to do the verification?


First launch. Search worked but some stores threw challenge message. First click opened and closed the browser window instantly (but it did seem to fetch the data), other ones opened, but there were no challenge. After closing the app, there are still 9 processes left in the task manager and next launch fails with an error


Seems like everything is working


The review is in: [
  {
    "file": "desktop/electronBrowserHub.ts",
    "line": 216,
    "summary": "monitorVisibleSolve exits silently when the user hides/closes the solve window, leaking pendingSolve state and never firing onSolveCleared.",
    "failure_scenario": "User clicks 'show browser window' for a challenged store; the store window appears but the user closes it (close handler preventDefaults + hides) before solving. The while-loop condition `entry.window.isVisible()` becomes false, so the loop ends without deleting `pendingSolve` or calling `onSolveCleared`. The renderer's solve overlay never receives `solve:cleared`, the search is never auto-retried, and the store stays 'challenge pending' until the user manually cancels."
  },
  {
    "file": "web/src/app/core/search.gateway.ts",
    "line": 80,
    "summary": "IpcSearchGateway.openOffer calls decorateOutboundUrl(url) synchronously inside the [href] binding, so a relative/malformed offer URL throws new URL() during change detection.",
    "failure_scenario": "An adapter yields an offer whose `url` is protocol-relative or otherwise not absolute. On desktop, `[href]=\"outUrl(o)\"` calls `gateway.openOffer` → `decorateOutboundUrl` → `new URL(raw)`, which throws mid-render and breaks the results view. The HTTP gateway builds `/out?…` via URLSearchParams and never parses the URL, so the same offer renders fine in the POC — a desktop-only crash surface."
  },
  {
    "file": "web/src/app/app.config.ts",
    "line": 5,
    "summary": "window.comparatorDesktop is read at module-eval time with no typeof guard, so evaluating app.config in a non-browser context (prerender/SSG) throws ReferenceError.",
    "failure_scenario": "If any Angular prerender/SSG or unit context evaluates app.config in Node (where `window` is undefined), `const desktopBridge = window.comparatorDesktop` throws at build/eval before the ternary runs. The prior config had no top-level `window` access; a `typeof window !== 'undefined' && window.comparatorDesktop` guard restores safety."
  },
  {
    "file": "desktop/main.ts",
    "line": 59,
    "summary": "DesktopHostCapabilities is constructed but effectively unused — host.browserFetch is the same `browser` object and presentInteractiveSession/openExternal/storage are never wired to the engine or IPC.",
    "failure_scenario": "`new DesktopHostCapabilities(browser, planStorage)` only ever supplies `host.browserFetch`, which is literally the `browser` argument; the engine receives `browser` and the IPC layer receives `planStorage` directly. `presentInteractiveSession`, `openExternal`, and `storage` on the capability object are dead. The Phase-A HostCapabilities contract this class is meant to fulfill isn't actually consumed, so the indirection adds a maintenance surface with no behavior."
  },
  {
    "file": "desktop/ipc.ts",
    "line": 39,
    "summary": "The offer:open IPC handler, preload openOffer, and DesktopBridge.openOffer are dead — the renderer never invokes them.",
    "failure_scenario": "`IpcSearchGateway.openOffer` returns `decorateOutboundUrl(url)` synchronously and outbound clicks are handled entirely by main's `setWindowOpenHandler`/`will-navigate` → `openExternalUrl`. Nothing in the renderer ever calls `bridge.openOffer`, so the `offer:open` handler (ipc.ts:39), the preload `openOffer` (preload.cts:12), and the `openOffer` member of the `DesktopBridge` interface (desktopBridge.ts:17) are unreachable code."
  }
]


Two residual notes — low, not blockers, your call:
1. LocalSearchGateway.openOffer (search.gateway.ts:108) still calls raw decorateOutboundUrl(url) rather than the new desktopOfferHref() guard. It's the un-wired Phase-G stub so it can't throw in practice yet, but the same hardening the Ipc path just got would apply there for consistency.
2. In window solve-mode, the overlay's Cancel (closeSolve()) closes the Angular dialog but doesn't tell the hub to close an already-shown store window — the user has to close that OS window themselves (which then correctly fires onSolveDismissed). Wiring Cancel to a dismissSolve IPC would close the loop, but it's a minor UX gap, not a correctness bug.


commit


Review is in: [
  {
    "file": "desktop/electron-builder.yml",
    "line": 1,
    "summary": "No explicit `publish` provider; auto-update feed and CI metadata upload depend entirely on the env-gated `repository` field injected by build-package.mjs.",
    "failure_scenario": "The staging dir .phase-e/app has no git remote, so electron-builder resolves the GitHub update provider solely from package.json `repository`, which build-package.mjs writes only when process.env.GITHUB_REPOSITORY is truthy. A developer-run `package:desktop:*` (no GITHUB_REPOSITORY) produces installers with NO app-update.yml embedded — they silently never check for updates — and generates no latest*.yml, so if that path ever ran in the release job the `if-no-files-found: error` upload step hard-fails. An explicit `publish: {provider: github, owner, repo}` removes the hidden coupling."
  },
  {
    "file": "desktop/build-package.mjs",
    "line": 52,
    "summary": "`desktopName` in the generated package.json is not a recognized electron-builder field and has no effect.",
    "failure_scenario": "The Linux .desktop file name derives from productName + `syncDesktopName: true`, and the bundle identifier comes from electron-builder.yml `appId: lv.carp.parts-comparator`. The `desktopName: \"lv.carp.parts-comparator\"` key is dead config that reads as if it controls the desktop entry but is ignored — misleading and duplicates the appId already declared authoritatively in electron-builder.yml."
  },
  {
    "file": "desktop/updateManager.ts",
    "line": 71,
    "summary": "Update-check failures are logged twice — once via the promise `.catch` and once via the `error` event listener.",
    "failure_scenario": "When checkForUpdates() rejects (missing feed, offline, 404 on latest.yml), electron-updater both rejects the returned promise (caught at line 71 → logError) and emits an `error` event (onError → logError at line 74/86). Every transient network failure produces two identical `Desktop update error:` log lines. Pick one channel."
  },
  {
    "file": "desktop/updateManager.ts",
    "line": 42,
    "summary": "Smoke-mode detection is duplicated between updateManager.ts and main.ts and can drift.",
    "failure_scenario": "`process.env.DESKTOP_SMOKE === \"1\" || process.argv.includes(\"--smoke\")` appears here (line 42) and identically in main.ts:74. If the smoke trigger ever changes (e.g. a new flag), one site can be updated without the other, causing the updater to arm during a smoke run or the smoke branch to skip while updates are disabled. Extract a shared `isSmokeRun()` helper."
  }
]


Is this the last phase? And you can commit the changes


Everything shows passed on my Pixel 10a running Android 17


The review is in: /tmp/claude-1000/-home-Messier82-projects-car-parts-co
  mparator-poc/f0672c66-7fab-4cec-af61-9887283b584a/scra
  tchpad/notes.md


Check again


Let's kick off next phase


Trodo and ic24 both fail


Now it crashes on launch instantly


Trodo and ic24 still fail


Trodo and ic24 still fail, rezerveadalaa24 show challenge but no challenge jn the opened page


How can i pull the lpgs if im working just frlm the device?


its in project root folder


Now ic24 succeeded, trodo asked for a challenge, but page opens and closes after less than half a second (and for that time period, i See there's no challenge) and autodoc.lv returns no results. You need logs?


The new reporet is in the root folder


Trodo asked for challenge, the browser page shows no challenge (also, while in there, fix the looks of that screen - it looks goofy and the button on top just doesnt make sense). Autodoc also asks for challenge but browser shows "turnstileBotCheck"


Autodoc still shows "turnstileBotCheck" and the new design is better, but I don't see the obvious button of "Done" of some sorts and it's so up there, that the camera cut out is cutting in it


Carparts.lv also returns no results, while I verified on their site that the code i'm looking for have products. And this is actually old, because previously I've just assuemed that there were no offers for that part but there are


Not just Android. Even hosted version had this


Now it wors=ks, thanks


What phase it was?


And which phases are still pending?


Can you do a build that opens the browser view for a challenge? Just with a random store page. I want to see how it looks


Close button is white with a stroke. Could it be black/dark grey?


Keep in mind the dark mode


It doesnt look like vector icon. It's big, grey (not even dark grey) and blurry


Can we add some nice modern animations to open and close of that view?


Good. Now remove the force open


The review is in: /tmp/claude-1000/-home-Messier82-projects-car-parts-comparator-poc/f0672c66-7fab-4cec-af61-9887283b584a/scratchpad/phase-g-review.md


Commit


You can remove those


Now that desktop and android distributions are done, I want to adjust the design to better fit them. 1 - header does not looks like it belongs on an desktop app (not web app) and especially mobile app. 2 - the design should be working better with native desktop window frames or we shall implement our own so it looks better and more coherent. I would image this applies to all 3 OSes. 3 - kinda the same as 2 but for Android - the notification bar (that is the system one) has a little different shade of the color and sticks out which looks goofy, imo


Go ahead, please


Did you build windows and android bundles? Windows shall be portable


Windows is perfect minus the fact that on purchase plan the native buttons are overlapping the UI. Android is perfect


Buttons now clear but 2 issues: most of their surface area is unclickable (does not react to mouse events) and second - current position is a little bit confusing being the close button so close to the window close button. I think we shall mitigate it in 2 actions: the whole purchase plan top bar should be moved downwards to make space for the native buttons and I think we should change the close button to something else


Much better. 2 nits: the top border should be 1 px lower so that it is not overlapped by the native buttons (it's now abruptly ends); "Atpakal" button can lose the label. Jsut the arrow is enough, I think


We have a bug with trodo. So when I tried to fetch it, at irst it shown that it needs a challenge resolve. I clicked it, the browser window instantly disappeared and it showed 0 results. So then I went to trodo with my browser, it asked for a challenge, I've resolved it. Then I've entered same part number and then it showed challenge window but it was loading and then disappeared and it showed a few result for the same part number. So something happened with that on the apps side


It wasnt android. It was windows. Why did you assume that it was Android? You should've asked


Smae behavior


I though you did build a new portable .exe


Now trodo outright shows zero results, Rezervesdalas, EUAutodalas, Autotoc shows challenge required, pressing which opens a browser window it closes after a sec automatically (no challenge there), it tries again and again shows challenge required and then same (no challenge on the page, closes automatically after sec)


So now. I entered first part number. All of the before challenged one, asked for challenge. Trodo I saw it, but it closed the window before I had a chance to resolve it. All others same loop. What's interesting is then I entered second part number. Trodo succeeded, ic24 succeeded, others same loop


34118831822 and 51137497285


Finally, works


Commit this


I want to implement a feature. We shall start from the functional docs and only after finalizing those, proceeding. The feature is simple: search history


Beside the search field? That how?


Okay. Also - list the questions here


1 - yes; 2 - yes; 3 - yes, but if keyboard was used to select the item, pressing tab will just prefill it; 4 - yes, a search is a search; 5 - yes; 6 - what measurement?


I think we can safely remove all of it. We don't really need it


Go ahead with the implementation


Build windows portable and android apk


I think separate button to view history is unnecessary. In the industry, the history is shown on input focus


Commit


There's a bug on desktop version (worth checking others aswell) - main scrollbar goes under the header when the handler is up


Bundles built?


I mean, those were the main target. We need portable .exe and android .apk


Let's add a opacity to header and a blur filter for a more modern look


Either you didnt rebuild or the something is not right - I its still non transparent


commit


Theres an issue with autodoc.lv adapte5. At least on Android it fails constantly. Idk about Windows, may be the case aswell


I think we shall also allow to refetch the store results. Regardless of the result - success, chexk rewuired, failed


did you rebuild the apk?


I alsp think tgat on case of failure we shall be able to see or pull the logs


yes, go ahead


Car Parts Comparator diagnostic report
Generated: 2026-07-18T14:02:00.956Z
Host: android

Selected store: autodoc
[2026-07-18T14:01:57.072Z] autodoc fetch_failed query=34118854273 duration=11602ms status=n/a cached=false offers=0 code=fetch_failed
  message: autodoc: WebView fetch HTTP 503 for [url removed]
  2026-07-18T14:01:45.541Z operation_started detail=page
  2026-07-18T14:01:45.541Z navigation_started
  2026-07-18T14:01:49.759Z navigation_finished status=200
  2026-07-18T14:01:51.288Z challenge_detected status=200
  2026-07-18T14:01:56.314Z navigation_finished status=200
  2026-07-18T14:01:57.070Z response status=503 detail=complete

Recent cross-store attempts:
[2026-07-18T14:01:57.072Z] autodoc fetch_failed query=34118854273 duration=11602ms status=n/a cached=false offers=0 code=fetch_failed
[2026-07-18T14:01:54.996Z] rd24 success query=34118854273 duration=9526ms status=200 cached=false offers=26 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:52.199Z] ic24 success query=34118854273 duration=6729ms status=200 cached=false offers=4 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:52.088Z] euautodalas success query=34118854273 duration=6618ms status=200 cached=false offers=15 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:49.698Z] xparts success query=34118854273 duration=4230ms status=200 cached=false offers=15 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:48.344Z] trodo check_required query=34118854273 duration=2874ms status=n/a cached=false offers=0 code=challenge_required
[2026-07-18T14:01:48.331Z] partsale success query=34118854273 duration=2863ms status=200 cached=false offers=20 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:48.261Z] eoltas success query=34118854273 duration=2792ms status=200 cached=false offers=10 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:47.560Z] handler success query=34118854273 duration=2091ms status=200 cached=false offers=14 code=n/a
[2026-07-18T14:01:46.322Z] carparts success query=34118854273 duration=853ms status=200 cached=false offers=4 code=n/a


Now it asks for a challenge and there shows "turnstileBotCheck"


Now it works. Now we need to refine the diagnostics feature. Right now its too apparent. It should be more hidden


The store chip list on desktop is gppd, but on mobile ot takes half of the screen real estate. What solutions would you suggest?


Yes, my thoights also were similar to 1


Lets start with that, yes


apl built?


then do it


elevation of that card ia too much, alao thers no.animation. And there ahould.be.lpading indicator


I think botypm panel, like youve suggested initially will be better


The arrow is pokntinf up. I think to the rifht is mkre logical


commit


commt


Now let's address the frontend code. I feel like it could to a lot of refactoring. Like, for example, app.html is large. So I want you to analyze the whole frontend and determine the places that need refactor and do it


We need to translate the app to Russian and English. We also shall have a language selector. The default language shall be selected based on device language. The selection must be remembered by the system


Spec approved, proceed


Tried Android: 1 - my system language is English and it was not preselected. 2 - the selector looks goofy. 3 - selector uses native system selector that doesnt look consistent with the system. We must use Spartan ng. Also, we might want to rethink the place where the selector is located - maybe we need to introduce Settings page? Where this selector would live aswell as a button to get Debug logs, so we can remove the info button from the UI


How well header selector will play with existing purcahse plan button?


That was the question: according to the adjusted spec, with the gear icon, how well would it look?


Okay, proceed


Seqrch results lost the top spacing


The bottom overlay pane for store status chips does not work


language selector shows en/lv/ru and in ropdown it full names English/Russian etx


The degault emptt state label is not centered


The purchase plan. Orders tab. Qty control is not inline with the item itself


No, i wanted it to be on the same row as price and store action


this should apply to desktop aswell. Unless you want to objext


Purchase plan panel opening button does not expand for additional badge; parts and variants tab - price shpuld be on the lefr and vuttoa shpuld be on the right, but not space between all of them


comit


Let's go back to the idea of hosted distribution model with a pitch of selling traffic to the stores which we abandoned. Can we use browserless.io?


Let's theoretically drop "no evasion" rule


What are other similar options? This was just the one that popped up in the search


Which ones of them provide free testing tier that we can use?


What if we implement something on our side? Or that's too much effort to maintain?


Let's go back to the legal part. Detail the points.


So, what I think we can do: host a version with open stores, track their clicks. Also make available dedicated options (Anroid, desktop) which is a little less approachable to the user but has twice as many stores. Also track clicks from them (disablable, notify user about that). This will give us the leverage without legal stuff to approach closed stores, say "see, we have those open stores, they get the traffic,even separate apps give the traffic, do you want to be in?". Something along those lines. When big ones are, we go to the existing open ones, give them the fact that they're getting free traffic and now we want to work with them, or they're out