Successfully created and wrote to new file: /home/Messier82/.gemini/tmp/service-book/6a1c8d1e-8a60-4460-a64e-c185658d819d/plans/pr-86-review-fixes.md. Here is the updated code:
# Plan: Address PR Review Comments for Issue 81

## Objective
Address the feedback provided in the code review for PR #86, which improves the Sentry integration and fixes the email validation UI.

## Key Files & Context
- `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ServiceBookApplication.kt`
- `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ui/reportbug/ReportBugViewModel.kt`
- `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ui/settings/SettingsScreen.kt`
- `app/src/test/java/com/servicebook/ServiceBookApplicationTest.kt`
- `app/src/test/java/com/servicebook/ui/reportbug/ReportBugViewModelTest.kt`

## Implementation Steps

### 1. Duplicated environment/release computation (Issue #1)
- **Target:** `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ServiceBookApplication.kt`
- **Action:** Change the visibility of `sentryEnvironment` and `sentryRelease` from `protected open` to `internal open` so they can be accessed by the ViewModel.
- **Target:** `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ui/reportbug/ReportBugViewModel.kt`
- **Action:** Update the call to `sentryWrapper.lazyInitAndSendFeedback`. Instead of recalculating the environment and release strings using `BuildConfig`, pass `app.sentryEnvironment` and `app.sentryRelease`. The `app` instance is already available via the injected `dependencies.app`.

### 2. `internal` visibility purely for tests (Issue #2)
- **Target:** `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ServiceBookApplication.kt`
- **Action:** Change the visibility of `configureSentryOptions` from `internal` to `private`.
- **Target:** `app/src/test/java/com/servicebook/ServiceBookApplicationTest.kt`
- **Action:** Update the test `` `configureSentryOptions sets dsn, environment and release with privacy defaults` `` to mock `SentryAndroid.init` to capture the `SentryAndroidOptions` parameter when `app.doSentryInit` is called, allowing the assertions to pass without requiring internal access to `configureSentryOptions`. Alternatively, use the `SentryEnabledApp` to expose the options inside its overridden `doSentryInit`.

### 3. "Force test crash" has no confirmation (Issue #3)
- **Target:** `app/src/main/java/com/servicebook/ui/settings/SettingsScreen.kt`
- **Action:** Change the `TextButton` for the "Force test crash" action to an `OutlinedButton` to make it visually distinct from the other debug actions.

### 4. Test naming nit (Issue #5)
- **Target:** `app/src/test/java/com/servicebook/ui/reportbug/ReportBugViewModelTest.kt`
- **Action:** Rename the test method from `` `canSubmit should be false when email is invalid` `` to `` `canSubmit reflects email validity` `` to better represent its assertions.

## Verification & Testing
- Run all unit tests to ensure that the refactored `ServiceBookApplicationTest` still passes and correctly verifies the Sentry options.
- Verify that `ReportBugViewModelTest` passes with the renamed method and the new reliance on the application's environment and release getters.
- (Manual/Preview) Verify that the Settings screen's debug crash button is visually distinct as an `OutlinedButton`.